But, i'm facing an issue that, i can. Camelot fork without ghostscript installation guide is similar, but this time from the github repo itself Hm, even if i see what you mean it's hard to give an answer straight from this context
Power Ghost is still alive. LEAKED!! - YouTube
Could you please take some time to provide us with a minimal reproducible example
Might make things go quite faster overall
I think that using @mousedown on the moving element and binding the given class to it is the way to go But there might be a lot of ways of achieving such a result. From ghost documentation on custom pages Firstly, as i keep saying, ghostscript (and the pdfwrite device) do not 'merge', 'concatenate', 'modify', 'edit' or whatever, pdf files
When you supply input to ghostscript it fully interprets it, producing a sequence of graphics primitives, which it then passes to the device In the case of low level devices, these use the graphics library to render the primitive to a bitmap Is ghostscript the best option if you want to optimize a pdf file and reduce the file size I need to store alot of pdf files and therefore i need to optimize and reduce the file size as much as po.
Rendering the input file to a bitmap shows the same white area, so it is nothing to do with the pdfwrite device
If you are convinced the output is incorrect then you should open a bug report. In case you are fed up with all the errors derived from the usage of ghostscript and want to find a way to use camelot without using ghostscript, here is the fork of it which does not rely on it
