But the main advantage comes with multiple inheritance, where all sorts of fun stuff can happen. I used to use list< Super() is a special use of the super keyword where you call a parameterless parent constructor
SuperStackedStacy #25 : u/Independent-Sir3146
In general, the super keyword can be used to call overridden methods, access hidden fields or invoke a superclass's constructor.
The one with super has greater flexibility
The call chain for the methods can be intercepted and functionality injected. In fact, multiple inheritance is the only case where super() is of any use I would not recommend using it with classes using linear inheritance, where it's just useless overhead. As for chaining super::super, as i mentionned in the question, i have still to find an interesting use to that
For now, i only see it as a hack, but it was worth mentioning, if only for the differences with java (where you can't chain super). Super e>) says that it's some type which is an ancestor (superclass) of e Extends e>) says that it's some type which is a subclass of e (in both cases e itself is okay.) so the constructor uses the
Extends e form so it guarantees that when it fetches values from the collection, they will all be e or some subclass (i.e
'super' object has no attribute '__sklearn_tags__' This occurs when i invoke the fit method on the randomizedsearchcv object I attempted to tune the hyperparameters of an xgbregressor. I'm currently learning about class inheritance in my java course and i don't understand when to use the super() call
I found this example of code where super.variable is used I wrote the following code When i try to run it as at the end of the file i get this stacktrace 'super' object has no attribute do_something class parent
What is the difference between list<
