I can't really figure it out (this is to confirm the number of people for an event i am hosting with someone else.) a I've tried to teach myself, but i just can't seem to do it
Jon-Erik Hexum Nude - leaked pictures & videos | CelebrityGay
Will someone please help me figure this problem out?
Which of these is in the correct format
Commenting 12 years later… from the perspective of descriptive linguistics, i would say that thanks john is used by native speakers, moreso thanks john! when you use it, don't use a comma if in that context you wouldn't say it that way—if there would be no pause between thanks and john, otherwise use a comma if there would be a pause. John is sometimes used as slang for a bathroom or a toilet I'm curious, what is the origin of this usage? I would like to provide an example of signed form, but how to avoid using gender when it comes to names
John doe is very generic, rolls off the tongue, and in colloquy is not easily mistaken for a known person, like john smith might be (there was at least one very famous john smith, and though that name is commonly equated with anonymity the usage is less formal) The john doe name itself has a very long history English records of anonymous or unknown persons being called john doe date back. As per jon hanna's second example, you can also use this parenthetically
My manager (copied) will need to provide approval my manager (copied in) will need to provide approval as per mt_head's comment you may also see copy on , although to me it sounds more natural to use copy in on
I've copied my manager on this email as. It is formally correct to say 'with john and me' or 'with me and john', but the first one is the preferred style in print or in school (as peter and john said) 'with me and john' sounds informal because of this style choice Also 'with john and i' is formally incorrect (prepositions in english take the accusative case), but there is a tendency nowadays for people to say it because, by.
Which of the following is correct
