I'm used to use transaxction blocks in postgresql like begin New in.net 2.0, the transactionscope object (system.transactions.dll) allows use over a range of operations (suitable providers will automatically enlist in the ambient transaction) But in oracle it seems tha.
How To FIX "Transaction Could Not Be Processed At This Time" On
7 you can't kill/rollback a transaction from another session without killing the owner session
I think, allowing to kill/rollback a transaction from another user's session means many design and security rule violations because it requires entering another user session (in the context of the current sql server engine design).
I have a long running process that holds open a transaction for the full duration I have no control over the way this is executed Because a transaction is held open for the full duration, whe. The code within the methods you call need to be transaction aware and enlist in the active transaction
This means creating or using classes which are resource managers (see implement your own resource manager You do this by implementing ienlistmentnotification and enlisting in the transaction When the transaction is completed, the transaction manager will call methods as defined on that. Optimistic locking consists in detecting that another transaction has updated/deleted the same row, and throwing the exception you're getting in this case
If you have a version field, you're already using optimistic locking, and this is what throws the exception
Pessimistic locking will make your application slow and subject to deadlocks. Could not commit jpa transaction Transaction marked as rollbackonly this exception occurs when you invoke nested methods/services also marked as @transactional. In plain english, what are the disadvantages and advantages of using set transaction isolation level read uncommitted in a query for.net applications and reporting services applications?
The alternative is an ambient transaction
